Discussion about this post

User's avatar
LaVerne Karras's avatar

Just to demonstrate how pervasive, and effective the thought control is, you commented on China’s "Three Warfares Doctrine", something I did a search for evidence that it existed and could find none.

Expand full comment
Stefan's avatar

Voters Aren’t Stupid—They’re Outsmarted (and How to Fix It)

The Holocaust looms as a stark reminder of humanity’s capacity for horror, often tied to modern debates about Israel and moral responsibility. Yet when voters fail to respond—or worse, act against their own interests—are they simply dumb? No. They’re ensnared by a highly intelligent elite wielding sophisticated manipulation, exploiting human psychology and survival instincts to serve a handful of oligarchs at the expense of the many. The fix isn’t in scolding voters—it’s in dismantling the system that outsmarts them with transparency and accountability rooted in human nature.

This isn’t voter ignorance; it’s calculated deception. A well-funded machine pumps out lies, preying on existential needs—the scramble to survive, the lure of short-term relief. Hamburg’s SPD win rode a flimsy narrative; Merkel flipped promises to cling to power, knowingly trading Germany’s future for her own, a tactic echoed by Ursula von der Leyen. These moves aren’t flukes—they’re the work of a minority thriving on voters’ warped perceptions, built from false facts. The elite know people will grab quick fixes—tax cuts, empty slogans—despite the disaster ahead, like addicts chasing a hit. In the U.S., monopolies like Google and Amazon warp democracy and capitalism, unchecked because laws like Glass-Steagall languish. Voters aren’t dim; they’re blinded by design.

History warns us: the Holocaust fed on apathy, but today’s apathy is engineered. The current system proves crime pays—politicians face no real cost for self-serving betrayal. Merkel and her ilk prosper while the many suffer, a predictable outcome when laws don’t bite. But human psychology isn’t a flaw to lament; it’s a fact to harness. People act in their own interest—always will. The solution? Make crime unprofitable for politicians, not through naive morality, but by aligning their self-interest with the public’s good.

Here’s how: Build a bulletproof system of transparency and accountability. Deploy tools—real-time public financial disclosures, mandatory voting records, and AI-driven audits—to expose every move. Tie this to civil and criminal law: hold politicians individually liable for corruption or deliberate harm, with penalties that sting—fines, jail, bans from office. No more slaps on the wrist. When crime doesn’t pay, behavior shifts—not from virtue, but survival. Ludwig Erhard’s “Soziale Marktwirtschaft” in Germany aimed for this: reward top performers while safeguarding the many, a human-centric balance. Singapore refines it today, blending meritocracy with strict oversight—elites prosper only when the system thrives for all, not a few.

This isn’t socialism; it’s psychology-driven governance. Transparency kills the shadows where monopolies and autocracy breed, while accountability forces the powerful to serve broadly or lose everything. The top dog still earns more—fair enough—but not by crushing the pack. Voters, meanwhile, get clarity, not propaganda. The Holocaust thrived on silence; today’s crises thrive on deceit. Unmasking manipulators isn’t enough—rig the game so self-interest serves the many, not the oligarchs. That’s the duty: not just to history, but to the outsmarted, who deserve a system as cunning as their foes.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts