did the perps plot to kill bystanders to buttress the assasination narrative. My uneducated absent forensic guess is that Trump's ear should have shown more damage from an AR-15 graze.
People were killed that day and not a single word on who they were or why the shooter did what he did. Not one single word!! No in-depth analysis about motive’s or background why? Why so silent?
The fact that others were hit means that shots were fired, I can't imagine that Trump would allow that to happen though the fact that they could pretty much guarantee that the shooter would be killed, there's no guarantee either that he wasn't supposed to shoot others and think that he could get away while stagecraft was used on Trump, but then the people arranging everything could make sure he wouldn't be captured and interrogated, had the cop do a 'Jack Ruby'. Who can tell either way, is there a scar on Trumps ear?
It is articles like this that undermine Thomas Karat's work altogether. He needs to apply his own analytic method and not use ChatGPT for sensational BS.
The iconic photo of the bloodied, defiant Trump with the flag is too good to be true.
did the perps plot to kill bystanders to buttress the assasination narrative. My uneducated absent forensic guess is that Trump's ear should have shown more damage from an AR-15 graze.
People were killed that day and not a single word on who they were or why the shooter did what he did. Not one single word!! No in-depth analysis about motive’s or background why? Why so silent?
100% fake. The blood isn’t believe able given this close up photograph.
How much more can the American people take? Trump isn’t even plausible. He is a world class joke.
Anyone who believes that Trump was actually shot is either naive, thick as two short planks at the bottom of a muddy pond or a gaslighting shill.
Theatrics aside, this stunt appears benign opposite the previous admin brazen lies and misdirections.
The fact that others were hit means that shots were fired, I can't imagine that Trump would allow that to happen though the fact that they could pretty much guarantee that the shooter would be killed, there's no guarantee either that he wasn't supposed to shoot others and think that he could get away while stagecraft was used on Trump, but then the people arranging everything could make sure he wouldn't be captured and interrogated, had the cop do a 'Jack Ruby'. Who can tell either way, is there a scar on Trumps ear?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/07/14/who-are-trump-rally-shooting-victims/74399786007/
It is articles like this that undermine Thomas Karat's work altogether. He needs to apply his own analytic method and not use ChatGPT for sensational BS.